Widow's Mite Coin
The Widow’s Mite: Good or Bad Example of Giving?11/26/2018 For centuries, Christians have assumed that Jesus wants us to emulate a poor widow’s sacrificial giving of her only 2 coins. As the story goes in Mark 14, Jesus was watching people put money into the Temple treasury. Rich people put in a lot of money. Then, a poor widow put in 2 small copper coins worth about a penny. Jesus saw a lesson here for the disciples so he gathered them together and said: “this poor widow put in more than all the other contributors to the treasury; for they gave out of their surplus, but she, out of her poverty, gave all she owned, all she had to live on.” - Mark 12:43-44 Jesus’ commentary makes it clear that the widow felt the impact of her contribution much more than all the rich people giving money they didn’t need. She gave the very money that she needed to buy food to survive. Her sacrifice had painful consequences in her poverty. We have historically assumed Jesus is commending the widow’s example to us. We typically interpret the significance of the story just like Joy Allmond does on the Billy Graham Evangelistic Associationblog: What matters to God is our heart toward our money and our possessions. Do we see them as ours, or as His? Regardless of how much we give to Kingdom work–whether it is $10 or $10,000–Jesus makes it obvious to us in Luke 21:1-4 [the story of the Widow’s mite] that He is most pleased with those who had to sacrifice to give that $10. What is your “mite?” Are you sowing sacrificially from your resources? Before we can jump to personal application like this article does, we need to make sure we understand Jesus’ original meaning. Is the point of Jesus’ observation to praise the sacrificial heart and actions of the widow? The only way to answer that question is to examine the context. Each story included in each Gospel is contributing to a larger story about Jesus’ identity and mission. We must interpret each story by how it connects to the material before and after it. In the case of the widow’s offering, that context completely changes our assumptions about what Jesus is communicating. Context Controls Meaning The question we must ask about the context is: Why does the Gospel of Mark place the story of Jesus watching Temple treasury donations (Mark 12:41-44) between his condemnation of Jewish religious leaders (Mark 12:38-40) and his prediction of the Temple’s demolition (Mark 13)? When you read the story in this context, you find verbal connections between the widow’s gift to the Temple and Jesus’ predictions of judgment. Jesus is not talking about generosity or self-sacrificial love before or after the story of the widow. He is talking about how corrupt the religious leaders are who control the Temple and how the Temple is going to be completely destroyed in a future act of divine judgment. Here is what Jesus says immediately before the widow’s story in Mark 12:41-44: “Beware of the scribes who like walking around in long robes and respectful greetings in the market places, and chief seats in the synagogues and places of honor at banquets, who devour widows’ houses, and for appearance’s sake offer long prayers; these will receive greater condemnation.” Do you see the verbal connection in his reference to widows? Another verbal connection occurs in the following passage when Jesus predicts the Temple’s destruction: As He was going out of the temple, one of His disciples said to Him, “Teacher, behold what wonderful stones andwhat wonderful buildings!” And Jesus said to him,“Do you see these great buildings?Not one stone will be left upon another which will not be torn down.” – Mark 13:1-2 If you read carefully, you recognize that Jesus talks about widows in the preceding context and the Temple in his subsequent remarks to the disciples. That context is how we should understand the story about the widow giving her last penny to the Temple. Jesus is angry at other Jewish teachers who are persuading widows to give all their money to the Temple bank account. He sees a corrupt religious system that no longer honors God’s heart to care for the needy. Teachers of the Law no longer honor the intent of the Law. Instead, the system has created wealthy religious celebrities who construct lavish buildings and pray in long robes to puff up their public reputation, while the poor go bankrupt. That’s why he isn’t impressed by the “wonderful stones” and “wonderful buildings” in the Temple complex. Jesus is intentionally highlighting the widow’s gift to the Temple as an illustration of how messed up Jerusalem is. He is condemning Jerusalem’s leaders just like Amos and Isaiah and Ezekiel did before him. The widow’s gift is evidence of what Ezekiel saw in the Temple over 600 years earlier: “The people of the land have practiced oppression and committed robbery, and they have wronged the poor and needy and have oppressed the sojourner without justice” (Ezekiel 22:29). In that context of prophetic judgment against Jerusalem, the widow’s offering takes on a much different meaning than we first suspect. The Real Meaning of the Widow’s Mite The widow is a victim of oppression not an example to follow. We typically assume Jesus said or implied, “Go and do likewise.” But he didn’t. What did he say? He emphasized that the widow “out of her poverty, put in all she owned, all she had to live on.” The repetitive “all she owned, all she had to live on” draws the observant reader to Jesus’ message. This widow no longer had anything left to live on because Temple teachers had convinced her to donate it to their extravagant slush fund. The widow’s offering is an illustration of injustice not generosity. The widow’s livelihood was being devoured by wealthy religious teachers just like some TV evangelists today convince poor people to send in their money so they can use it to buy private airplanes. The widow may have had an obedient heart, but Jesus cared more about correcting the corruption. God’s people were supposed to be caring for the poor not taking from them. As Kirk MacGregor writes in his critique of how Word-Faith Movement prosperity preachers abuse this text, “there are many passages in the Bible which, in context, teach that Christians should give, and give sacrificially, to meet the financial needs of poor members of the body of Christ, the poor in general, people who serve in vocational ministry, the local church, and the global church (e.g.2 Cor. 8–9; Rom. 15:25-33; Matt. 25:31-46; 1 Tim. 5:17-18; Acts 2:44-45; 4:32–5:11). However, the account of the widow’s mite is simply not one of them. Rather, this text stands in the prophetic tradition of condemning unscrupulous religious leaders who steal from the poor under the guise of their giving to God (e.g. Amos 5:11-12; 8:3-10; Isa. 3:14-15; 10:1-2; Jer. 23:1-2; Ezek. 22:26-31; Psa. 10:1-9; Prov. 22:16, 22; 1 Tim. 6:3-10; 2 Peter 2:2-3, 14-15; Jude 11).” Jesus was on a mission to end this corrupt system. That’s why he promised to do for people what religious leaders said only the Temple priests could provide. He offered forgiveness of sins without having to pay inflated prices to underhanded Temple businesses to make animal sacrifices. He predicted the demise of the Temple buildings and the reconstruction of a new Temple in his body to stop this kind of religious abuse (John 2:19). During his earlier ministry, Jesus attacked the practice of Korban where religious elites dedicated their possessions to the Temple rather than using their resources to care for aging parents in poverty (Mark 7:9-13). He wanted justice and mercy to replace tithing regulations that concentrated wealth among the religious elites (Matthew 23:23). He was on a mission to relieve widows from the “heavy burdens” placed on them by leaders who loved privilege and lacked self-sacrificing servanthood (Matthew 23:1-12). That is a mission we must continue today. How The Widow’s Offering Applies Today The widow’s offering reminds us that generosity without discernment is not commendable. Self-sacrificial giving to misguided causes doesn’t please the Lord. God wants justice and mercy embodied by people who walk humbly before the Lord (see Micah 6:8). He doesn’t want Christian celebrities who build beautiful buildings and publicly demonstrate their religiosity. He doesn’t want people in poverty giving their last cent to corrupt Christian industrial complexes. The original purpose of the tithe was to care for the poor not rob them under the auspices of religious devotion. In Deuteronomy 26:12, God’s people were commanded every third year to give their tithe to the poor, both widows and impoverished Levitical priests (see Chris Wright's Old Testament Ethics for the People of God). James 1:27 makes it clear: “Religion that is pure and undefiled before our Lord and Father is to care for orphans and widows in their distress.” Jesus doesn’t add more stress to those in poverty by asking for a donation. He believes in exactly what God mandated in Deuteronomy 15:11, “Since there will never cease to be some in need on the earth, I therefore command you, ‘Open your hand to the poor and needy neighbor in your land’” (cf. Isa. 25:4; 58:7; Psa. 41:1; 72:4, 12; Prov. 19:17; 21:13; 28:27; 31:9). This demand for justice could hardly be more relevant today in churches across the globe where pastors persuade poor people to give them all their money. In fact, the government in Angola drafted a law in 2018 to require “proper training” for pastors because too many have devised schemes to take money from the poor with promises that God will bless their financial sacrifice. They sell water bottles blessed by the pastor for exorbitant prices to accumulate money for themselves. Who knows how the Angolan government will define “proper training” for pastors, but something must be done to protect the most vulnerable in Angolan society. The path won’t be easy, but it is a path that Jesus blazed in first-Century Israel. It is a path we must blaze today. It is the reason I preach the same sermon Why Does God Bless People? every time I get to speak at Majority World churches plagued by “Christian” voices trying to “devour widows’ houses.” In the United States, we could compare the widow’s Temple offering to a poor lady who gives money she needs for food to a ministry with large surpluses and an extravagant CEO salary. One big ministry in the USA had a $189 million surplus in 2017 after raising excess money for hurricane relief, and they only plan to spend a third of that surplus to help more people in 2018. Their low-income donors actually need that money more than the ministry does for its cash reserve accounts and $1 million CEO salary. If you want to know which ministries fall into this category, contact me. God is a God of justice and mercy. He doesn’t want wealthy or poor donors supporting corrupt causes. He wants well-resourced people to care for the vulnerable. Temple authorities were not supposed to be taking from the vulnerable but making sure people gave their tithe every third year to them. That was the Law in Deuteronomy, and Jesus wants it to be the heart his people have. That wasn’t happening at the Temple in Jesus’ day. And if it isn’t happening today, it’s our task to eliminate unjust systems that are crushing the vulnerable and establish merciful patterns of sharing God’s blessings with those struggling to eat. That’s why I spend my life at Excellence in Giving helping wealthy Christians support ministries that embody Jesus’ passion for justice and mercy around the world. Watch & Share this Bible Background Explainer Video that summarizes this surprising insight about the Widow’s Gift: NOTE: I am not the first Bible scholar to discuss the meaning of this pericope in the literary contexts of Mark and Luke. This same interpretation has been readily adopted over the past 35 years as Jesus’ larger message of judgment against corrupt Jewish leaders in Jerusalem has been more commonly recognized in the Gospels. See Emma Crossen’s “Be Like The Widow” or Addison Wright’s “The Widow’s Mites: Praise or Lament? – A Matter of Context”. 1/29/2019 12:14:57 pm Fantastic article, and as pertinent today as it was 2000 years ago. Like so many others, I believed this was a lesson comnending sacrificial giving, but this article, along with a similar sermon by John MacArthur, demonstrates so well that this is clearly not the case - thereby bucking the trend of virtually every commentary on this biblical passage. Congratulations and thanks to you for this surprising and remarkably well-informed insight which draws out the intended meaning of the passage raher than attempting to supplant it with our own meaning. 1/30/2019 07:43:05 pm Thanks David. It’s both exhilarating and then challenging to hear what Jesus really meant and what that might mean for us as we care for the poor in our time and identify corrupt religious figures that take advantage of them. 9/7/2019 06:34:46 am Thanks for your article. I've been doing a study on this to get a better understanding of the passage. I was enjoying your article until you started your discussion on TV Evangelists and how they use people's money to buy private jets. 9/10/2019 11:35:26 pm Philip - 12/6/2019 11:26:14 am once again proving the value of biblical interpretation and context. 12/30/2019 05:23:38 am It's easy to understand why John MacArthur doesn't like Jesus' story of giving by the widow. Her gift was a sacrifice. Gifts from the wealthy aren't sacrifices. They're tax deductions. They're ways to dress up in tuxes at 'charity' galas to impress others. MacArthur doesn't like the story of the giving widow because he's a Donald Trump supporter who glorifies the rich, their greed and their emptiness. I've never met one conservative/republican who is a practicing Christian. They despise all of Jesus' teachings and love the rich. They support the wealthy over the poor, the sick and the hungry. They vote for republicans who are prostitutes to the rich and sell out the poor, middle class and even slaves to their rich pimps. 9/17/2020 12:47:30 pm Why can't Jesus be teaching both things? In fact, I would say the contextual narrative is about the heart. You have scribes, which love appearances, yet their heart is not right with God. The widow gives all she has. I don't see that as a deviation from the context. It flows right along. The scribes are heading for the judgement He describes, and the appearance of religion is no shield against it. Just my thoughts. 12/10/2020 11:39:21 am I'm not sure you have a correct view of Christianity. Being a Christian doesnt make you moral. That is the problem, none of us are moral. I am not moral. Have you ever lied? Have you ever stolen anything? Jesus said if you lust after a person you have committed adultry with them in your heart. Have you committed adultry? If you hate someone you have committed murder. Have you ever hated someone? If you are like me, you are a lying thief, adulterer at heart, murdering blasphemer among other things. If you are judged by God on judgment day will you go to heaven or hell? God must punish the wicked and created hell to punish those who have broken His laws. I know you say you dont believe in God but the fact is that our beliefs do not change reality. Out belief in or against God does not change whether He exists or not. That means you are in real trouble on judgment day. Thankfully God sent His Son to pay our fine. We deserve death for our crimes. Jesus paid that penalty for us. It is not available just to everyone automatically though. You have to repent (turn from your sinful lifestyle toward God) and put your faith in Jesus like you would a parachute if you were to jump out of a plane. One day you will make that jump from this life into the next and without Jesus you will take the full penalty of your actions. That is what Christianity is about. A bunch of sinners who realize their need for Christ and are willing to follow Him even to death because Jesus is more important than anything in this world. 5/20/2020 01:31:04 pm I was beginning work on my sermon on this passage and was bothered by this short story in the midst of judgment. I was beginning to to take the standard approach that the widow was an example of sacrificial giving, but it just did not fit the context, so I struggled with it. Fortunately, with God's help I came to the same conclusion that you took of the passage. We must be careful with context. Thanks for your help with this passage. 5/23/2020 10:47:54 pm Joe - 7/14/2020 05:59:35 am Thank you for your article. Yes, as you mention, there are commentators who see this not as a commendation of sacrificial giving but as a lament of the failure of the temple’s establishment to care for such widows and/or a condemnation of the corrupt temple system for robbing this woman of her last coins. While I definitely agree that this has merit in view of the context of judgment on the temple (its destruction) that you point out, in my humble opinion this interpretation founders on Jesus’ undeniable insistence in verse 44 that her gift is greater than that of the rich. I just cannot explain this away as anything but a commendation of her action! So, with other commentators such as Wessel and France, I would still prefer to opt for a focus on sacrifical giving rather than a condemnation of the rottenness of the temple. This story of the widow then contrasts the selfish greed of the scribes with her sacrificial generosity and also demonstrates once again the reversal of values in the kingdom that Jesus has been trying to teach his disciples (in this case, not admiration for the outward show of the rich who gift a tiny part of their abundance but admiration of the sacrificial giving of this poor woman). In addition, its lesson (that the greatest gift is giving all we have: v 44) puts in a nutshell anticipates what is soon to happen: Jesus will give everything (Himself!) for us. 8/10/2020 09:09:59 am Thanks for such good info. Can you help me with this...I read somewhere there were 13 trumpets in the temple for giving and that they represented the ministries of the priests. I havent been able to find much on this or I am not looking in the right places. 11/22/2020 01:58:22 pm Donahue & Harrington Sacra Pagina commentary on the Gospel of Mark: 'According to the Mishnah (m. Sheqalim 6:5) there were thirteen trumpet-shaped chests in the sanctuary, each one labelled for its different purpose (yearly taxes, bird offerings, etc.)' 9/3/2020 09:09:05 am Paul, this is a very insightful interpretation that actually turns this episode on its head for many of us. Thanks for sharing this. If only the so-called evangelicals in America would love first the widows and orphans and aliens and other powerless groups in keeping with God's priorities. 9/7/2020 10:42:50 pm Thanks Dave. Jesus’ painful observation about religious leaders taking advantage of this poor widow reveals a lot about God’s heart. It is a challenging lesson for those of us who want to care for people in poverty the way God does. 9/17/2020 01:11:08 pm But now that I think about it, I can see how her feeling compelled to give everything to the point of self-harm could have been born out of a manipulative culture created by the Scribes, who as Jesus pointed out just a couple of verses prior, took advantage of widows. I am not sure that one can strongly say that is more the point than a commendation of her sacrifice, but it is interesting to think about. 12/12/2020 11:09:26 am I was looking into the story of the widow's mite and I think you have an excellent understanding here and am blessed to have read your article. I am a new pastor and have never been to bible school. I agree well what you are saying about the religious leaders of the day and even the ones in our time. The only issue I have with your article is a small point but one that needs to be addressed. This widow woman in action WAS giving to the temple but in her heart wasn't she giving to God? I am one who has heard the prosperity message and have seen abuses by pastors and evangelists alike. Jesus is the one who said give and it shall be given you. Is not giving an avenue that God uses as a vehicle by which He blesses? Who can judge what was in this widows heart at the time she gave? Could not the Holy Spirit have directed her giving out of her need to produce greater fruit? Not looking for a fight here just desiring to learn and grow. Leave a Reply. |
Widow's Mite Coin Bible
Widow's Mite Coin
The widow’s mite coin necklace is also a reminder of the most important thing we should consider before we should give. The condition of our hearts. It allows us to ask ourselves if we are giving because it is a requirement. Or if we are giving based on responsibility.
Widow's Mite Coin Value
Here's your chance to own a genuine 'Widow's Mite' mentioned by Jesus in the Bible! When issued, these were the smallest coins circulating in Jerusalem; In Mark 12:41-44, Jesus tells the rich men of the temple that though they gave of their wealth, the widow gave her only two mites – a true gift of the heart. The coin Jesus spoke about in His parable of the widow we call the “Widow’s Mite.” This Second Temple period coin is actually a bronze prutah minted under Alexander Jannaeus (103-76 B.C.). What we call the “Widow’s Mite” is actually a bronze prutah (small denomination) from the Hasmonean period, minted under Alexander Jannaeus (103-76 B.C.). This is an interesting coin which on one side has a design of star with paleo-Hebrew characters in between the rays which spell out the Hebrew name of Alexander Jannaeus, Yehonatan. The Widow's Mite Coin: is a bronze lepton currency discovered in Israel and used in the new testament times.